new thread
I was reading a thread on if the mullet was coming back in style, I dont think so, but we have another stlye that will be feared for ages (though i go crazy every time i seen it, its so exciting) ITS THE MILLET!!!! Named by myself and another member of the board Piotr S. We noticed after going to a boston concert that a guy siting right infront of us had a weird haircut, Long hair on top of the head, NONE on the sides and tied back REAAAAALLL TIGHT (not even sure if he had any on the back) So we named this the millet.
Then we went to a local c.d store "looney toons" becouse KERRIE KING FROM SLAYER WAS THERE!!! YAAAAAAY!!!!!! Sorry that sounded kinda gay, ok well when we were waiting on line (i was really in the mood for a egg role i might add) And we seen......2!!!! 2!!!! MILLETS!!!!! Then going to the mall i seen another!!!
Fear the mullet yes......BUT WATCH OUT FOR THE MILLET!
That might be the stupidest thing I ever heard. Long hair on top and none on the sides is just an undercut. Nothing to do with a mullet and doesn't look bad on some people. This is a normal style nowadays. I wouldn't like the style, but it looks cool on some.
I have seen several in that style. In my opinion, I can't see how such a thing would last or even get off the ground. A "Buzz-cut" (sorry to say) even looks at least to me better.
some people can pull that look off good,
i wouldent want it on me though because i just don't like it that much
although it looked cool on Eddie Gurrereo, too bad he cut it though
About one month ago, I vas visisting downtown Duluth, Minnesota.
I saw a young man, about 20 to 25. He had short hair, except for a pencil-thin, braid that reached about five inches below his belt!
Is that a Millet?
I just wish that guy would grow his hair out all the way. Then his hair would look very cool!
Multi HMX-12
Umm, FYI, millet is actually a type of grain (I think). I personally think this style is ok, but I prefer all over length myself.
~Jenn
P.S. I'm not a know-it-all, I promise ^_^