new thread
I first started growing my hair as of september of last year. My goal was to make it long enuff until i had a sort of antonio baderas pony tail. First let me tell you a litle about my hair.My hair is curly and extremely frizzy and wavy. Anyways, after about 4 months of growing it, i decided to make an undercut.I did and all seemed well until about 3 month ago where i did a FULL UNDERCUT meaning they cut the sides and the whole back of your hair until the line that seperated your front head and back. It was a benefit for me because i could do a pony tail that is very high on my haid,exactly on the line that seperates the front and the back. I figured that when the hair growes aventually i would be abble to "lower the pony tail". Later i found out that i was wrong.No matter how long my opper hair becomes it is impossible to lower the pony because it has no hair in the back to grab on to.
The question: I read a post here that said that i could lower my pony tail withouth growing the sides.The guy who posted the post said that his freind haas the sides completely shaved and has the back hair grow to make a pony tail. He growes the hair till where he wants the pony tail to go down to.
Any thoughts?
Jonathan
Yeah, that's the way to lower the tail on your undercut, although have you tried wrapping the hair around your head and tying it tight at the back? A friend of mind has his undercut with the back shaved up to about the level for a 'step'
and the sides completely obliterated. It looks really neat. In any case you'll just need to grow the back hairs for a couple of months before you can bond them into a tie. Good luck my friend!
Yes! Undercuts are stupid. Period. Nothing in the history of mankind has looked as absolutely assinine as an undercut.
Sorry to say this, but you deserved what you got.
The undercut makes the mullet look good!
Whilst I'd agree that the undercut has had its day - namely 93-95. It's certainly a lot better than a mullet!
Having worn both I tell you I took a lot less stick about the undercut. That said - I've mentioned it before recently, undercuts work best with shorter length on top - I think it works best as sort of a "punk" look, length 6-8 inches and sides and back shaved grade 2 up to the crown - its not a sensible "longhair" style.
I'd say grow your undercut back in if you really want your hair long, otherwise you'll be stuck with an undercut forever... Its a no going back style, (unless your prepared to start over). The longer you grow the top the harder it is to comeback from, so start now.
Sorted
As much as I don't like to agree with you, sorted, after your recent attempts to cross me, I have to. Mullets are by far the worst hairstyle in existence. If one has thick top hair, I think undercuts are ok.
Despite your questionable shots at me, I still like your hair. Have you ever tried coloring it?
Thanks Jiargi - nice of you to say so.
No I have never tried colouring my hair, to be honest its about the only thing I would ever change about my hair.. maybe I'm just not bold enough.
That should have read NEVER change!